My reasonings:
Why 2 meters?
Last winter Barrie invited me to the 2008 SkyWarn Recognition Day. That night (early morning) I spent some time on 2 meters using WinLink listening in to conversation in Europe. That was impressive, but what really amazed me was how much more 'clean' the signals were. HF is fun, but in this low part of the sunspot cycle it can be a challenge to get a clean signal on HF.
Another thing that that I found intriguing about VHF was the community support centered around amateur radio communications. SkyWarn was one of those, but there are many others activities offering community support and interaction among people with related interests.
Final was the realization that for a tinkerer VHF had some advantages over HF. I like antennas! HF antennas can get very large, very fast. For those unfamiliar with radio frequency physics, the higher the frequency, the shorter the wavelength; and the shorter the wave length, the shorter the antenna. For a city dweller this is great!
Why the Icom?
I'm a Kenwood fan. My HF rig is an older Kenwood. It looks like a radio, a substantial radio, and it reminds me of my introduction to the hobby as a kid (young kid vs. older kid). Many of the modern radios just don't strike me as radios, but as computers. I spend my days with computers and I like a traditional look and feel in a radio. Kenwood's newer radios (to my taste) are ugly. I feel rather strongly about this to the degree that I've been looking around for an older 2 meter Kenwood. The problem is that most older rigs have very limited capabilities when it comes to the available sub-audible tones required for repeater use.
I spent a couple of weekends using one of Barrie's Yaseau tri-banders and found it just too small for my taste. Everything else was great, just the size didn't work well for me.
These things being such an issue for me, I wanted to 'get my hands' on some other radios. The Icom V85 got my attention from the beginning. It's smaller than the older 'walkie-talkie' style radios, but at least 30% larger than most of the 'tiny' units so popular these days. It also had the advantage of 7 watts output and the larger capacity 1700mAh Lithium-Ion battery. When I saw it, I was hooked.
Handheld vs. mobile?
I was originally committed to the idea of having a mobile unit that I could use on my desktop, yet still transport it when I went camping. Of course in reality that would be a unit dedicated to my desk and being used only a few times a year in the field. The biggest advantage to a mobile (in my opinion) was the extra power. Of course when you live 3~4 miles from several of the repeaters that may not mean as much, since you'd be operating at low power most of the time anyway.
Originally, I hadn't given much thought about a handheld until I started thinking about the convenience of the extra mobility and learning of the HT's popularity among some of the emergency service groups. Ultimately, I could be operating much quicker given my circumstances with the handheld than with a mobile base station.
Besides, you don't buy just one radio, you just buy them one at a time, right?
The downside?
Other features worth mentioning...
One other key feature of the V85 missing from many other units on the market is the ability to receive AND transmit while charging. There's a small caveat here, but in my opinion a negligible one. You can only do this with the Icom 12v adapter (cigar plug, CP-19R). The 'slow' charger included with the unit is just not capable of this task (though I have used mine on receive). The 12v adapter is optional (at apx. $30) and has a higher charging rate than the standard charger (though slower than the Rapid charger) and has filtering to reduce/eliminate line noise found in the typical wall-wart type chargers.
Finally, Icom has a full line of accessories for the V85, many common to other Icom units. Most of these accessories are respectably priced, though a few (like the Desktop Rapid Charger) seem a bit over-priced to me. I'm reserving any hard judgement for now and until I can get the Rapid Charger and perform a few tests, but I suspect that part of the extra cost is the additional circuitry to monitor the rapid charging in a way that gets the job done quickly without risking long-term battery reliability.
I have already purchase the HM-158L external speaker/microphone which ran just under $50 and I'm very pleased with it. I will share more details on this accessory at a fure date when I share my V85 Desktop notes.
Summary
Later, I will share some more technical details in my V85 Desktop notes and I plan to do some testing and comparison of a couple of different chargers and get to the bottom of a battery/charging controversy I've heard a folks tossing around.
Until then, enjoy!